Russian intel unit offered bounties for killing coalition troops in Afghanistan: report

Source: The Hill | June 26, 2020 | Olivia Beavers

A Russian military unit secretly sought to offer rewards to Taliban-linked militants to incentivize them to hunt and kill coalition forces in Afghanistan as the Trump administration engaged in peace talks to end the nearly two-decade long war, U.S. intelligence officials have reportedly concluded.

The New York Times, citing officials briefed on the matter, reported Friday that the U.S. intelligence apparatus has known for months about the alleged efforts of the Russian military intelligence unit, which reportedly provided rewards to militants for successful attacks last year.

U.S. troops were among the targeted coalition forces, according to the Times, which reported that some militants or associated entities are believed to have received reward money.

While 20 Americans died last year in combat in Afghanistan, it is unclear how many — or which specific cases — are linked to the killing bounties, the newspaper reported.

President Trump and other intelligence officials on the National Security Council reportedly discussed the matter in a meeting in late March, where they weighed a series of potential responses. However, no formal steps have been made, the Times reported.

The newspaper’s sources said they were unclear why there has been a delay. The motivations of the Russian intelligence unit’s alleged efforts are also unclear.

Some officials theorized the efforts could be to destabilize the West or take revenge for pro-Syria forces being killed when advancing on an American outpost in 2018, or keep the U.S. tied up in a war in Afghanistan by thwarting peace talks, according to the Times.

Still, such actions would mark a major escalation of Russian support of the Taliban and an attempt to turn violence onto coalition forces.

It would also mark an escalation of Russia’s actions toward the U.S., following its efforts to sow discord during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, during which the Kremlin used disinformation campaigns on social media platforms and cyberattacks to amplify an already divisive race.


Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Discussion
  •  Consistent #40542

     Consistent #40549

     Consistent #40550

     Consistent #40553

     Consistent #40563

     Consistent #40565

     Consistent #40567

     Consistent #40569

     Consistent #40571

     Consistent #40576

     Consistent #40578

     Consistent #40579

     Consistent #40580

     EVERYDAY #40581

    Trump may have been briefed about this, but as we have seen before, he tends not to listen or read any reports — particularly about anything unfavorable to him or which goes against whatever he wants to do. Trump has always liked strongmen like Putin. I don’t know — maybe he hopes by getting chummy with them, he will learn how to be a great dictator like them. So he’s going to schmooze these guys and ignore the harm or threat of harm to the US these dictators represent. In his world, everything is about him. Doesn’t matter how adversely his actions might affect others.

     Consistent #40585

     Consistent #40602

     Consistent #40603

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.