I am a Catholic, pro-life, libertarian populist, conservative who votes in Maryland. I consider it the least interesting part of politics to choose which of these politicians is the least objectionable candidate. I think reporting on them and putting their views and records in context is more interesting and important. But I love voting. I also believe in transparency, so here I will explain my vote.
I will be writing in Evan McMullin for president.
The simplest explanation is this: I find Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton abhorrent. I don’t want to associate myself with either of them, and I want to register a protest against Trump, specifically, in a conservative direction. I would vote Libertarian (the party in which I am registered), except that the Libertarian nominees oppose religious liberty.
I vote in Maryland, which Hillary Clinton will certainly win. That makes it easy to cast a protest vote and avoid lesser-of-two evil calculations. If I voted in a swing state, I would still cast a protest vote, however, because I can’t tell which of these authoritarian, untrustworthy, opaque, crony capitalist, liberal, New York millionaires is the greater evil.
I understand there are a hundred of conservative, moderate and libertarian counter-arguments to this position. So, while I don’t think I will convince many people — and that’s not even my aim here — I think it fair to lay out my thinking in detail. This article will piece together many of the arguments I’ve made over the past 9 months, to draw the map to my conclusion.
…..
- Discussion
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.