George Conway on Sunday warned that there is a “critical distinction” between finding evidence President Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia and concluding a crime was committed, suggesting evidence of collusion may exist.
Conway, an attorney and the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, said special counsel Robert Mueller would have reported that he found no evidence of collusion if that was the case and that Attorney General William Barr would have repeated that language in his summary to Congress.
“But Mueller didn’t, and Barr didn’t,” George Conway, who is publicly critical of Trump tweeted.
Yes, please do. It’s a critical distinction, and one not hard to understand. If Mueller had used the words “no evidence of a conspiracy or coordination” (i.e., no collusion), you can be damned sure Barr would have quoted those words. But Mueller didn’t, and Barr didn’t. https://t.co/dkLxnEWPQz
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) April 14, 2019
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.