Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday pressed former special counsel Robert Mueller on why he did not subpoena President Trump for an interview during his investigation into Russian election interference.
The lawmaker during a House Intelligence Committee hearing pressed Mueller on why his team did not pursue the president with a subpoena after Trump declined to sit for an interview voluntarily.
Mueller said his team weighed the evidence of Trump’s intent that the team had without the interview against the amount of time it would take to litigate a likely court challenge to a subpoena.
Mueller acknowledged that Trump’s written answers on Russian interference “were certainly not as useful as an interview would be,” but he said that his office ultimately decided against subpoenaing Trump because of the significant delay it would have caused to the investigation.
Maloney, who said Mueller didn’t strike him “as the kind of guy who flinches,” asked whether Mueller believed he had sufficient evidence to prove Trump’s intent without an interview and if that was the reason he didn’t seek a presidential subpoena.
“We had to make a balanced decision in terms of how much evidence we had” and how much time they were willing to spend in court, Mueller answered.
Mueller said they decided against a subpoena “because of the length of time that it would have taken to resolve the issue.”
- Discussion
-
JUST IN: Mueller explains decision not to subpoena Trump https://t.co/eRC2tfIezH pic.twitter.com/TB76uUANRq
— The Hill (@thehill) July 24, 2019
Wow >> Mueller says he didn’t subpoena the president “because of the necessity of expediting” the investigation.
The expectation was that Trump would fight the subpoena, Mueller said, and that would drag out the investigation.
— Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio) July 24, 2019
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.