Trump to order review of law protecting social media firms after Twitter spat: report

Source: The Hill | May 28, 2020 | Justin Wise

President Trump will reportedly sign an executive order on Thursday that mandates a review of a law that shields companies like Twitter, Google and Facebook from being held liable for the content appearing on their platforms after fact checks for the first time were added to two of his tweets.

The executive order Trump is expected to sign would direct the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to propose and clarify regulations stipulated under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, according to a draft copy obtained by Reuters. Section 230 protects social media platforms from facing lawsuits over what users share, though there are exceptions when it comes to copyright violations and breaches of federal criminal law. 

The move is set to come as Trump rails against Silicon Valley over Twitter’s decision earlier this week to add a fact-check label to two of his tweets about mail-in voting. Trump, who has repeatedly accused the tech giants of political bias, has cast the decision as an attempt to “silence” conservatives and threatened to shut down social media sites altogether. 

……..

An alteration to Section 230 could have wide-ranging consequences over how websites moderate comments and other posts shared on their platforms.

The order reportedly requests that the FCC evaluate whether social media companies should lose the Section 230 protections they enjoy if they take actions related to editing content. It also would direct the FCC to review whether any social media company uses deceptive content moderation polices and if they violate their own terms of service.

The final executive order could change before it is signed by Trump, Reuters noted.

A draft of the order also reportedly includes a directive for the White House Office of Digital Strategy to recreate a tool that gives Americans the opportunity to report alleged instances of censorship online. The so-called White House Tech Bias Reporting Tool would receive those complaints and submit them to the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The FTC would then be required to consider taking action and examine whether the complaints violated the law. The attorney general would also be directed to create a working group that assesses content moderation practices from social media companies.

…….

Section 230 has become increasingly controversial in recent years, with some critics holding that it allows tech companies to avoid taking responsibility for harmful content that spreads on their platforms. A group of lawmakers in March introduced a bill that would hold tech companies liable for images and videos of child abuse posted to their sites. The legislation faced intense pushback from tech advocates and supporters of Section 230.

Tagged: , , , , , ,

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 21 total)
1 2
  • Discussion
  • Consistent May 28, 2020 at 12:29 pm #39420

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 1:04 pm #39422

    ConservativeGranny May 28, 2020 at 1:05 pm #39423

    I thought only the government can censor and a privately owned entity can publish or not publish what they want. Just like a newspaper.

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 1:40 pm #39426

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 1:42 pm #39427

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 1:42 pm #39428

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 1:51 pm #39430

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 4:01 pm #39432

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 4:04 pm #39433

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 5:01 pm #39436

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 5:02 pm #39437


    Do it.

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 5:07 pm #39438

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 5:46 pm #39442

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 5:47 pm #39443

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 6:02 pm #39444

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 6:03 pm #39445

    EVERYDAY May 28, 2020 at 6:43 pm #39446

    I get the feeling this order will be quietly rescinded when Little Donnie’s temper tantrum has subsided. But if not, I expect it to be successfully challenged in the courts on constitutional grounds.

    Of course, the whole matter would be quickly resolved if Trump would stay off Twitter and get to work on real issues, or, failing that, if he would stop using Twitter to promote falsehoods.

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 7:31 pm #39451

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 7:32 pm #39452

    Consistent May 28, 2020 at 7:58 pm #39453

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 21 total)
1 2

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.